https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375265 The Court addressed issues related to the exercise of discretion under Article 226 and appeal provisions against cancellation of registration. It emphasized the need for a properly constituted Bench at the CESTAT Bangalore and expedited hearing of urgent matters. The Court acknowledged steps taken to address operational challenges and directed the Assistant Solicitor General to provide updates. It closed the Writ Appeals, allowing the appellants to pursue their case before the CESTAT without costs, emphasizing the preliminary nature of earlier observations. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Feb 2019 06:31:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375265 The Court addressed issues related to the exercise of discretion under Article 226 and appeal provisions against cancellation of registration. It emphasized the need for a properly constituted Bench at the CESTAT Bangalore and expedited hearing of urgent matters. The Court acknowledged steps taken to address operational challenges and directed the Assistant Solicitor General to provide updates. It closed the Writ Appeals, allowing the appellants to pursue their case before the CESTAT without costs, emphasizing the preliminary nature of earlier observations. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375265