<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 884 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375257</link>
    <description>An ex parte adjudication order under foreign exchange law was set aside because proper service of the show cause notice and a meaningful opportunity of hearing were not established. The court found no material to show deliberate avoidance of service or a conscious waiver of participation, and held that penal proceedings with serious civil consequences require fair procedure before liability is confirmed. The adjudication was therefore quashed and the matter directed to be reconsidered afresh after notice and hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 884 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375257</link>
      <description>An ex parte adjudication order under foreign exchange law was set aside because proper service of the show cause notice and a meaningful opportunity of hearing were not established. The court found no material to show deliberate avoidance of service or a conscious waiver of participation, and held that penal proceedings with serious civil consequences require fair procedure before liability is confirmed. The adjudication was therefore quashed and the matter directed to be reconsidered afresh after notice and hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>