https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375255 The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the retention order issued by the Adjudicating Authority. The judgment found the order deficient in legal sustainability due to non-compliance with procedural requirements and lack of substantive discussion on the necessity for retention of the property. The court emphasized the importance of procedural mandates and consideration of case merits in such orders. en-us Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 May 2026 13:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375255 The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the retention order issued by the Adjudicating Authority. The judgment found the order deficient in legal sustainability due to non-compliance with procedural requirements and lack of substantive discussion on the necessity for retention of the property. The court emphasized the importance of procedural mandates and consideration of case merits in such orders. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375255