<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 871 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375244</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, in a case concerning the demand of service tax for construction services, upheld the appellant&#039;s position despite the respondent&#039;s reliance on previous case laws. The Tribunal emphasized that subsequent apex court rulings superseded the cited cases, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and setting aside the impugned order. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 06:29:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 871 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375244</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, in a case concerning the demand of service tax for construction services, upheld the appellant&#039;s position despite the respondent&#039;s reliance on previous case laws. The Tribunal emphasized that subsequent apex court rulings superseded the cited cases, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and setting aside the impugned order. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>