<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 868 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375241</link>
    <description>Surrender/discontinuance charges collected on premature surrender of ULIP policies were held not to be consideration for a taxable service, because the amount arose from the policyholder&#039;s contractual right to receive surrender value and related to an actionable claim rather than a service. Interest was held payable on the short-debited CENVAT-linked amount until actual debit, although penalty was not imposed. The demand relating to other income was sustained with interest, but the related penalty was set aside. Rule 6 relief was denied to the Revenue, as ULIP management remained a taxable service and partial non-taxation did not convert the value into exempt service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 868 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375241</link>
      <description>Surrender/discontinuance charges collected on premature surrender of ULIP policies were held not to be consideration for a taxable service, because the amount arose from the policyholder&#039;s contractual right to receive surrender value and related to an actionable claim rather than a service. Interest was held payable on the short-debited CENVAT-linked amount until actual debit, although penalty was not imposed. The demand relating to other income was sustained with interest, but the related penalty was set aside. Rule 6 relief was denied to the Revenue, as ULIP management remained a taxable service and partial non-taxation did not convert the value into exempt service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>