<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 867 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375240</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax on Vostro transactions, deeming them as an export of service. However, the demand for service tax on SWIFT transactions was upheld under Sub-Clause (vii) of Banking or Other Financial Services. Penalties were waived due to the interpretational nature of the issue. The decision was made in consideration of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, with modifications pronounced in open court on 31.01.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 19:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 867 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375240</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax on Vostro transactions, deeming them as an export of service. However, the demand for service tax on SWIFT transactions was upheld under Sub-Clause (vii) of Banking or Other Financial Services. Penalties were waived due to the interpretational nature of the issue. The decision was made in consideration of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, with modifications pronounced in open court on 31.01.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>