https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375233 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (A)'s order and ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the interpretation of Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 concerning the sale of surplus electrical energy generated at the factory premises. The judicial member noted that the issue had already been decided in favor of the appellant in a previous case involving the same party and cited relevant precedents supporting the appellant's position. The appeal was allowed on 14/02/2019. en-us Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Feb 2019 06:29:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375233 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (A)'s order and ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the interpretation of Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 concerning the sale of surplus electrical energy generated at the factory premises. The judicial member noted that the issue had already been decided in favor of the appellant in a previous case involving the same party and cited relevant precedents supporting the appellant's position. The appeal was allowed on 14/02/2019. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375233