https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375228 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the applicability of Rule 9(i)(bb) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant's entitlement to avail credit under Rule 9(i)(e) was upheld, dismissing the allegation of suppression with intent to evade tax. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant rectified the error promptly, paid the tax along with interest, and declared the facts, leading to a conclusion of a revenue-neutral situation. The judgment set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal based on legal interpretations and precedents cited during the proceedings. en-us Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Feb 2019 08:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375228 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the applicability of Rule 9(i)(bb) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant's entitlement to avail credit under Rule 9(i)(e) was upheld, dismissing the allegation of suppression with intent to evade tax. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant rectified the error promptly, paid the tax along with interest, and declared the facts, leading to a conclusion of a revenue-neutral situation. The judgment set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal based on legal interpretations and precedents cited during the proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375228