<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 835 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375208</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions under Sections 68 and 69C, as well as the disallowance of interest payment. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately proven the genuineness of the transactions and that the AO failed to disprove the evidence provided. Additionally, the Tribunal noted the violation of principles of natural justice by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 835 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375208</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions under Sections 68 and 69C, as well as the disallowance of interest payment. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately proven the genuineness of the transactions and that the AO failed to disprove the evidence provided. Additionally, the Tribunal noted the violation of principles of natural justice by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>