<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 828 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375201</link>
    <description>Goods and vehicle detained because a single e-way bill covered three invoices were ordered to be released on execution of a simple bond. The Court noted the Department&#039;s practical difficulty in tracking invoices when multiple invoices are covered by one e-way bill, but also observed that this was not a case of complete omission of invoices from the e-way bill. In view of the nature of the issue, release of the goods and vehicle was directed on bond.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 828 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375201</link>
      <description>Goods and vehicle detained because a single e-way bill covered three invoices were ordered to be released on execution of a simple bond. The Court noted the Department&#039;s practical difficulty in tracking invoices when multiple invoices are covered by one e-way bill, but also observed that this was not a case of complete omission of invoices from the e-way bill. In view of the nature of the issue, release of the goods and vehicle was directed on bond.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>