<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 809 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375182</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties under Section 271(1)(c). It concluded that the assessee did not conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars, based on a bona fide belief. The transaction was classified as business income, taxable in the assessment year 2008-09, as finalized in the previous year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 809 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375182</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties under Section 271(1)(c). It concluded that the assessee did not conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars, based on a bona fide belief. The transaction was classified as business income, taxable in the assessment year 2008-09, as finalized in the previous year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>