<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 793 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375166</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all the appeals of KPTCL, quashing the orders under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act. It was determined that KPTCL&#039;s employees are not State Government employees for tax exemption on unutilized leave. However, the Tribunal recognized KPTCL&#039;s bona fide belief in their status and historical context, justifying their actions and negating the default status under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 793 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375166</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all the appeals of KPTCL, quashing the orders under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act. It was determined that KPTCL&#039;s employees are not State Government employees for tax exemption on unutilized leave. However, the Tribunal recognized KPTCL&#039;s bona fide belief in their status and historical context, justifying their actions and negating the default status under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>