<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 784 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375157</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision to restrict the disallowance of bogus purchases to 8%, considering the already declared gross profit of 4.5% by the assessee. Relying on various precedents, the Tribunal emphasized taxing only the profit element in such cases. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, concluding that the addition should be limited to the profit element embedded in the bogus purchases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:08:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 784 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375157</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision to restrict the disallowance of bogus purchases to 8%, considering the already declared gross profit of 4.5% by the assessee. Relying on various precedents, the Tribunal emphasized taxing only the profit element in such cases. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, concluding that the addition should be limited to the profit element embedded in the bogus purchases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>