<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 778 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375151</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing that import duty is leviable only when goods are in the hands of the importer, based on the actual quantity received in India, not the bill of lading quantity. The judgment clarified the correct basis for customs duty calculation, aligning with statutory provisions and Customs Valuation Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 778 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375151</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing that import duty is leviable only when goods are in the hands of the importer, based on the actual quantity received in India, not the bill of lading quantity. The judgment clarified the correct basis for customs duty calculation, aligning with statutory provisions and Customs Valuation Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>