https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375148 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant, setting aside the suspension of the license imposed by the Commissioner of Customs. The decision emphasized the lack of substantial evidence supporting the allegations of negligence in inspection and valuation of imported goods. The Tribunal highlighted the procedural adherence followed by the appellant, the absence of specific directives for functionality tests, and the acceptance of inspection reports by Customs Officials as pivotal reasons for overturning the suspension order. en-us Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:06:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375148 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant, setting aside the suspension of the license imposed by the Commissioner of Customs. The decision emphasized the lack of substantial evidence supporting the allegations of negligence in inspection and valuation of imported goods. The Tribunal highlighted the procedural adherence followed by the appellant, the absence of specific directives for functionality tests, and the acceptance of inspection reports by Customs Officials as pivotal reasons for overturning the suspension order. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375148