<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 771 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375144</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating they were not liable to pay service tax on the full amount received for maintenance and repair services. The judgment highlighted the significance of accurately categorizing services under tax provisions and maintaining proper documentation to validate tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:06:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 771 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375144</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating they were not liable to pay service tax on the full amount received for maintenance and repair services. The judgment highlighted the significance of accurately categorizing services under tax provisions and maintaining proper documentation to validate tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>