https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375143 The court dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai. The respondent, engaged in construction services, rectified errors in availing abatement and cenvat credit after audits. The court found the penalties imposed unwarranted, noting the corrective actions taken by the respondent. The appeal was rejected, upholding the Commissioner's decision to set aside the penalties under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to lack of evidence supporting repeated offenses. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:06:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375143 The court dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai. The respondent, engaged in construction services, rectified errors in availing abatement and cenvat credit after audits. The court found the penalties imposed unwarranted, noting the corrective actions taken by the respondent. The appeal was rejected, upholding the Commissioner's decision to set aside the penalties under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to lack of evidence supporting repeated offenses. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375143