https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375129 The appellant contested the classification of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (R-EPO) under Chapter heading No. 3003, insisting it should be under Chapter heading No. 3002. Despite ongoing correspondence, a duty demand notice was issued invoking an extended period for alleged suppression of facts. The appellate tribunal ruled the extended period unjustified, setting aside the order and penalties. Emphasizing procedural adherence and effective communication, the decision favored the appellant, underscoring the significance of accurate classification and limitation periods in customs disputes. en-us Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375129 The appellant contested the classification of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (R-EPO) under Chapter heading No. 3003, insisting it should be under Chapter heading No. 3002. Despite ongoing correspondence, a duty demand notice was issued invoking an extended period for alleged suppression of facts. The appellate tribunal ruled the extended period unjustified, setting aside the order and penalties. Emphasizing procedural adherence and effective communication, the decision favored the appellant, underscoring the significance of accurate classification and limitation periods in customs disputes. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375129