https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375122 The appellant was found ineligible for the SSI Exemption due to manufacturing Soya products under a brand name not owned by them, as per Notifications 8/2002 and 8/2003. The duty demand and penalties imposed were justified, given the appellant's failure to promptly address duty liability and obtain registration. The penalties on directors were reduced, but the overall decision was upheld, emphasizing the appellant's non-compliance with brand ownership and excise requirements. en-us Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:05:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375122 The appellant was found ineligible for the SSI Exemption due to manufacturing Soya products under a brand name not owned by them, as per Notifications 8/2002 and 8/2003. The duty demand and penalties imposed were justified, given the appellant's failure to promptly address duty liability and obtain registration. The penalties on directors were reduced, but the overall decision was upheld, emphasizing the appellant's non-compliance with brand ownership and excise requirements. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375122