<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 104 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16789</link>
    <description>The court held that commission paid in India for export business does not qualify for weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, as it did not relate to activities outside India as required by the law. Additionally, foreign telephone expenditure, salaries, rent, printing, stationery expenses, insurance expenditure, and sale promotion expenses were also deemed ineligible for weighted deduction under section 35B due to not meeting the necessary criteria outlined in the law. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee for all the discussed expenditures based on the provisions of section 35B and relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:25:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 104 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16789</link>
      <description>The court held that commission paid in India for export business does not qualify for weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, as it did not relate to activities outside India as required by the law. Additionally, foreign telephone expenditure, salaries, rent, printing, stationery expenses, insurance expenditure, and sale promotion expenses were also deemed ineligible for weighted deduction under section 35B due to not meeting the necessary criteria outlined in the law. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee for all the discussed expenditures based on the provisions of section 35B and relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>