<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1156 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Rs. 20 lakhs incentive received by the assessee was a capital receipt, not taxable as revenue. The subsidy was deemed a capital receipt under the Package Scheme of Incentive, 1993, for setting up a new unit in a backward area. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating the amount should not be reduced from the cost of assets for depreciation calculation. The decision was pronounced on 21st September 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:07:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1156 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Rs. 20 lakhs incentive received by the assessee was a capital receipt, not taxable as revenue. The subsidy was deemed a capital receipt under the Package Scheme of Incentive, 1993, for setting up a new unit in a backward area. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating the amount should not be reduced from the cost of assets for depreciation calculation. The decision was pronounced on 21st September 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>