<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 54 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16788</link>
    <description>For deemed gift-tax under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, adequate consideration is not the same as the highest market value; a transfer will not be treated as for inadequate consideration if the price is fair or reasonable. A departmental valuation showing a higher market value does not by itself establish inadequacy, and only a price so low as to shock the conscience can justify that conclusion. On the facts, the Tribunal found no material inadequacy in the consideration, so the transfer was held not to attract deemed gift-tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:24:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 54 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16788</link>
      <description>For deemed gift-tax under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, adequate consideration is not the same as the highest market value; a transfer will not be treated as for inadequate consideration if the price is fair or reasonable. A departmental valuation showing a higher market value does not by itself establish inadequacy, and only a price so low as to shock the conscience can justify that conclusion. On the facts, the Tribunal found no material inadequacy in the consideration, so the transfer was held not to attract deemed gift-tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>