<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 70 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16786</link>
    <description>Section 36(1)(viii) was construed to require the prescribed percentage deduction to be calculated on total income computed before Chapter VI-A deductions, and the later Finance Act, 1985 amendment was treated as clarificatory rather than a change in law. On that basis, the Board circular dated 12 November 1973 was consistent with the statutory scheme for the relevant period and supported the assessee&#039;s method of computation. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the circular was inapplicable or contrary to the Act was therefore incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:20:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 70 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16786</link>
      <description>Section 36(1)(viii) was construed to require the prescribed percentage deduction to be calculated on total income computed before Chapter VI-A deductions, and the later Finance Act, 1985 amendment was treated as clarificatory rather than a change in law. On that basis, the Board circular dated 12 November 1973 was consistent with the statutory scheme for the relevant period and supported the assessee&#039;s method of computation. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the circular was inapplicable or contrary to the Act was therefore incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>