https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278622 SC allowed the appeal, set aside the HC judgment and restored the trial and first appellate decrees, holding the occupant to be a tenant rather than a licensee based on long-term exclusive possession and nature of business. The deed of license was treated as a camouflage to evade rent law. The suit for mandatory injunction by the respondent was dismissed. The occupant was directed to pay Rs. 2,000 per month as rent from April 1, 2004, and costs were awarded in the proceedings. en-us Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Sep 2025 11:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278622 SC allowed the appeal, set aside the HC judgment and restored the trial and first appellate decrees, holding the occupant to be a tenant rather than a licensee based on long-term exclusive possession and nature of business. The deed of license was treated as a camouflage to evade rent law. The suit for mandatory injunction by the respondent was dismissed. The occupant was directed to pay Rs. 2,000 per month as rent from April 1, 2004, and costs were awarded in the proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278622