<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 16 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16781</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1981-82 was without jurisdiction due to being barred by limitation. The court also found that the failure to record reasons for issuing the notice further invalidated the proceedings. As a result, the court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice under section 148, the assessment order, and the demand notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:09:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 16 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16781</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1981-82 was without jurisdiction due to being barred by limitation. The court also found that the failure to record reasons for issuing the notice further invalidated the proceedings. As a result, the court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice under section 148, the assessment order, and the demand notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>