<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 701 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for inaccurate particulars of income related to unsecured loans and unsecured creditors. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a fresh enquiry during penalty proceedings and found the penalty arbitrary, lacking proper due diligence. As a result, the penalty was deemed to be without a firm basis and was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 06:20:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 701 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for inaccurate particulars of income related to unsecured loans and unsecured creditors. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a fresh enquiry during penalty proceedings and found the penalty arbitrary, lacking proper due diligence. As a result, the penalty was deemed to be without a firm basis and was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>