<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 698 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375071</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, reducing the profit estimation from 12.5% to 11% regarding alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal considered the lack of proof for genuine purchases and upheld the addition under section 69C of the Income Tax Act. Stay petitions were dismissed as the appeals were decided on merit. The decision was rendered on 11/12/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 06:20:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 698 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375071</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, reducing the profit estimation from 12.5% to 11% regarding alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal considered the lack of proof for genuine purchases and upheld the addition under section 69C of the Income Tax Act. Stay petitions were dismissed as the appeals were decided on merit. The decision was rendered on 11/12/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>