<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 685 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375058</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for refund of unutilized cenvat credit following business closure. The appellant&#039;s claim was supported by Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and judicial precedents. The Tribunal emphasized taxpayer rights and criticized authorities for unjustly rejecting the claim without proper legal justification, setting aside the decision and allowing the appeal with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 685 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375058</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for refund of unutilized cenvat credit following business closure. The appellant&#039;s claim was supported by Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and judicial precedents. The Tribunal emphasized taxpayer rights and criticized authorities for unjustly rejecting the claim without proper legal justification, setting aside the decision and allowing the appeal with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>