<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 680 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375053</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order by setting aside penalties entirely and remanding the service tax demand issue for proper quantification, considering property tax paid and rent received in advance. Appeals were partly allowed and partly remanded with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 06:18:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 680 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375053</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order by setting aside penalties entirely and remanding the service tax demand issue for proper quantification, considering property tax paid and rent received in advance. Appeals were partly allowed and partly remanded with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>