<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 675 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375048</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, classifying the transportation services under GTA service, not mining service. The extended period of limitation for issuing the show cause notice was deemed unjustifiable, and penalties under Section 78(1) of the Finance Act were waived due to the appellant&#039;s bona fide belief and compliance. The appellant was entitled to consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 06:18:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 675 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375048</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, classifying the transportation services under GTA service, not mining service. The extended period of limitation for issuing the show cause notice was deemed unjustifiable, and penalties under Section 78(1) of the Finance Act were waived due to the appellant&#039;s bona fide belief and compliance. The appellant was entitled to consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>