<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 670 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375043</link>
    <description>Interim relief against recovery and licence consequences may be confined to conditional, limited protection where the court balances hardship against the authority&#039;s need to secure dues and compliance. The court accepted that no strong ground existed to disturb the interim order, but considered the closure of the bar, part-payment already made, the undertaking for the balance, and the imminent expiry of the licence. It therefore refused the full time sought and instead permitted staged payment with strict default consequences, including cancellation of the licence and further monetary liability, while preserving the parties&#039; substantive rights for adjudication in the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 06:18:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 670 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375043</link>
      <description>Interim relief against recovery and licence consequences may be confined to conditional, limited protection where the court balances hardship against the authority&#039;s need to secure dues and compliance. The court accepted that no strong ground existed to disturb the interim order, but considered the closure of the bar, part-payment already made, the undertaking for the balance, and the imminent expiry of the licence. It therefore refused the full time sought and instead permitted staged payment with strict default consequences, including cancellation of the licence and further monetary liability, while preserving the parties&#039; substantive rights for adjudication in the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>