https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375040 The appellate authority remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for further investigation and decision based on Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944. This decision was made due to procedural irregularities, including the selective cross-examination of witnesses, which raised concerns about the violation of natural justice principles. The remand aimed to ensure compliance with statutory requirements and conduct a thorough examination of transporter statements to reevaluate the case fairly. en-us Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Feb 2019 06:17:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375040 The appellate authority remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for further investigation and decision based on Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944. This decision was made due to procedural irregularities, including the selective cross-examination of witnesses, which raised concerns about the violation of natural justice principles. The remand aimed to ensure compliance with statutory requirements and conduct a thorough examination of transporter statements to reevaluate the case fairly. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375040