<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 84 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16775</link>
    <description>Voluntary contributions were treated as a referable question of law on whether they are taxable as income despite section 2(24)(ii)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the Tribunal was directed to state the case on that issue. The earlier failure to pursue the point for one assessment year did not bar reference for a later year, because each assessment year is a separate proceeding and res judicata does not apply in terms to income-tax assessments. The formulated legal question was therefore referred to the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:54:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 84 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16775</link>
      <description>Voluntary contributions were treated as a referable question of law on whether they are taxable as income despite section 2(24)(ii)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the Tribunal was directed to state the case on that issue. The earlier failure to pursue the point for one assessment year did not bar reference for a later year, because each assessment year is a separate proceeding and res judicata does not apply in terms to income-tax assessments. The formulated legal question was therefore referred to the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>