<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 665 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375038</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;place of removal&quot; under excise law is relevant to valuation and assessable value, not to fixing the applicable rate of duty. Where goods were cleared from a consignment agent&#039;s premises after a duty increase, the rate was required to be determined by reference to the date of removal from the factory, and valuation concepts could not be used to alter that rule. The order under challenge erred in law by treating the consignment agent&#039;s premises as the relevant place for rate determination. The assessee&#039;s contention was accepted, and the demand and penalty did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 06:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 665 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375038</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;place of removal&quot; under excise law is relevant to valuation and assessable value, not to fixing the applicable rate of duty. Where goods were cleared from a consignment agent&#039;s premises after a duty increase, the rate was required to be determined by reference to the date of removal from the factory, and valuation concepts could not be used to alter that rule. The order under challenge erred in law by treating the consignment agent&#039;s premises as the relevant place for rate determination. The assessee&#039;s contention was accepted, and the demand and penalty did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>