<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 663 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375036</link>
    <description>A Supreme Court decision on auctioned leasehold property held that an auction purchaser could not be required to pay fresh unearned increase where the grant, auction notice and conveyance deed showed the property was sold as leasehold and the Government had already remitted the unearned increase. It also held that conversion charges paid for conversion from leasehold to freehold were not refundable, because the deed and surrounding documents did not establish that freehold rights had been conveyed, and no legally sustainable mistake in payment was shown. The conversion application, however, was directed to be processed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 06:17:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 663 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375036</link>
      <description>A Supreme Court decision on auctioned leasehold property held that an auction purchaser could not be required to pay fresh unearned increase where the grant, auction notice and conveyance deed showed the property was sold as leasehold and the Government had already remitted the unearned increase. It also held that conversion charges paid for conversion from leasehold to freehold were not refundable, because the deed and surrounding documents did not establish that freehold rights had been conveyed, and no legally sustainable mistake in payment was shown. The conversion application, however, was directed to be processed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>