<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1710 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278605</link>
    <description>Education cess and higher education cess paid through PLA were treated as part of the duty refund or self-credit entitlement available under Notification No. 56/2002-CE. The analysis relies on the principle that cess, being a continuation of duty, follows the same refund treatment where duty paid through PLA is refundable. It also notes that later restrictions in Notification Nos. 19/2008-CE and 34/2008-CE could not curtail that entitlement because those notifications had already been quashed by the High Court. The operative effect was that the assessee remained entitled to refund or self-credit of the relevant duty and cesses without the later notification-based restriction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1710 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278605</link>
      <description>Education cess and higher education cess paid through PLA were treated as part of the duty refund or self-credit entitlement available under Notification No. 56/2002-CE. The analysis relies on the principle that cess, being a continuation of duty, follows the same refund treatment where duty paid through PLA is refundable. It also notes that later restrictions in Notification Nos. 19/2008-CE and 34/2008-CE could not curtail that entitlement because those notifications had already been quashed by the High Court. The operative effect was that the assessee remained entitled to refund or self-credit of the relevant duty and cesses without the later notification-based restriction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>