https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278611 The court quashed the Order-in-Original dated 29th February 2008, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication due to lack of concrete proof and violation of natural justice principles. The reliance on a report without cross-examination was criticized, emphasizing the need for substantive evidence in allegations of clandestine removal. The court directed the department to gather detailed records and conduct experiments on electricity consumption patterns before issuing show cause notices. The petitioner was allowed to proceed with the writ petition, highlighting the inadequacy of evidence and the violation of natural justice principles. en-us Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Feb 2019 06:16:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278611 The court quashed the Order-in-Original dated 29th February 2008, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication due to lack of concrete proof and violation of natural justice principles. The reliance on a report without cross-examination was criticized, emphasizing the need for substantive evidence in allegations of clandestine removal. The court directed the department to gather detailed records and conduct experiments on electricity consumption patterns before issuing show cause notices. The petitioner was allowed to proceed with the writ petition, highlighting the inadequacy of evidence and the violation of natural justice principles. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278611