https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278616 The Supreme Court examined alleged non-implementation of the high security registration plate scheme and possible outsourcing of blank plate manufacturing contrary to its earlier directions and Rule 50 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. It noted prima facie material suggesting manufacture had been shifted to an unauthorised unit and that the process may not have conformed to the approved scheme, but also recorded the manufacturer's undertaking not to outsource blank plate production in future and to follow the contract, rules and orders. In view of that undertaking and the passage of time, the Court declined to proceed with contempt, while leaving States free to take action for any future violation noticed. en-us Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Feb 2019 06:16:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278616 The Supreme Court examined alleged non-implementation of the high security registration plate scheme and possible outsourcing of blank plate manufacturing contrary to its earlier directions and Rule 50 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. It noted prima facie material suggesting manufacture had been shifted to an unauthorised unit and that the process may not have conformed to the approved scheme, but also recorded the manufacturer's undertaking not to outsource blank plate production in future and to follow the contract, rules and orders. In view of that undertaking and the passage of time, the Court declined to proceed with contempt, while leaving States free to take action for any future violation noticed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278616