<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 812 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278597</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the orders of the CIC and the learned Single Judge. The Court held that the information sought was not to be divulged in the public interest and was exempt from disclosure under a purposive construction of Section 8 of the RTI Act. No order was made as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 17:59:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 812 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278597</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the orders of the CIC and the learned Single Judge. The Court held that the information sought was not to be divulged in the public interest and was exempt from disclosure under a purposive construction of Section 8 of the RTI Act. No order was made as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>