<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1907 (8) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278592</link>
    <description>Section 99 of the Transfer of Property Act regulates sales by a mortgagee after attachment in execution of a money decree and is designed to protect the mortgagor&#039;s equity of redemption. A sale made in breach of that provision is treated as an irregular exercise of jurisdiction, not as a proceeding without jurisdiction, so it is not a nullity but an illegal and voidable sale. The protection may be waived by the mortgagor. Before confirmation, the sale may be prevented or set aside on proof of contravention alone; after confirmation, it may be set aside only if the applicant proves lack of notice because of fraud or other sufficient cause.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 1907 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:17:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1907 (8) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278592</link>
      <description>Section 99 of the Transfer of Property Act regulates sales by a mortgagee after attachment in execution of a money decree and is designed to protect the mortgagor&#039;s equity of redemption. A sale made in breach of that provision is treated as an irregular exercise of jurisdiction, not as a proceeding without jurisdiction, so it is not a nullity but an illegal and voidable sale. The protection may be waived by the mortgagor. Before confirmation, the sale may be prevented or set aside on proof of contravention alone; after confirmation, it may be set aside only if the applicant proves lack of notice because of fraud or other sufficient cause.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 1907 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>