<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (5) TMI 268 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278591</link>
    <description>The court held that the respondent&#039;s statement to vacate the premises within 15 days constituted an undertaking to the court, enforceable through committal proceedings. The incorporation of the terms into the court order converted them into an undertaking to the court. The Rent Control Tribunal was deemed a &#039;court&#039; under the Contempt of Courts Act. The respondent&#039;s failure to vacate led to a finding of civil contempt, resulting in a fine of Rs. 2,000 and a potential one-month civil prison term if the premises were not vacated within 15 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:35:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (5) TMI 268 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278591</link>
      <description>The court held that the respondent&#039;s statement to vacate the premises within 15 days constituted an undertaking to the court, enforceable through committal proceedings. The incorporation of the terms into the court order converted them into an undertaking to the court. The Rent Control Tribunal was deemed a &#039;court&#039; under the Contempt of Courts Act. The respondent&#039;s failure to vacate led to a finding of civil contempt, resulting in a fine of Rs. 2,000 and a potential one-month civil prison term if the premises were not vacated within 15 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>