https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278588 The Supreme Court found the respondent guilty of criminal contempt for filing false affidavits regarding the possession of the suit premises. Despite offering an unconditional apology, the Court deemed it insincere. A fine of Rs. 2000 was imposed, with the alternative of one month's simple imprisonment in case of default, to be paid as compensation to the petitioner. The Court decided against forfeiting the respondent's bonds and dropped the perjury case due to the punishment in the contempt matter. en-us Fri, 27 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:06:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278588 The Supreme Court found the respondent guilty of criminal contempt for filing false affidavits regarding the possession of the suit premises. Despite offering an unconditional apology, the Court deemed it insincere. A fine of Rs. 2000 was imposed, with the alternative of one month's simple imprisonment in case of default, to be paid as compensation to the petitioner. The Court decided against forfeiting the respondent's bonds and dropped the perjury case due to the punishment in the contempt matter. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278588