<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (8) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278587</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition and ancillary petitions, finding them devoid of merits. The appropriate remedy was for the respondents to buy up the shares of the petitioners, already being pursued in a separate suit. The court emphasized that the obstructive tactics of the petitioners could not be allowed to prevail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:57:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (8) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278587</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition and ancillary petitions, finding them devoid of merits. The appropriate remedy was for the respondents to buy up the shares of the petitioners, already being pursued in a separate suit. The court emphasized that the obstructive tactics of the petitioners could not be allowed to prevail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>