<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Penalized for Concealing Documents u/ss 76 &amp; 78 of Finance Act; Penalty Confirmed for Suppressing Facts.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44469</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 76 and 78 of FA - the act of appellant of concealing relevant documents despite being afforded with the opportunity is definitely a positive act on his part to prove the alleged suppression of facts. Admittedly, ST-3 returns were also silent about the receipt of impugned income - penalty confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:34:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:34:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Penalized for Concealing Documents u/ss 76 &amp; 78 of Finance Act; Penalty Confirmed for Suppressing Facts.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44469</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 76 and 78 of FA - the act of appellant of concealing relevant documents despite being afforded with the opportunity is definitely a positive act on his part to prove the alleged suppression of facts. Admittedly, ST-3 returns were also silent about the receipt of impugned income - penalty confirmed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:34:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>