<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 657 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375030</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete additions of unexplained credits in a firm&#039;s Books of Accounts under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The partners failed to establish the creditworthiness of the sources of their advances to the firm. The judgment emphasized the importance of proving the identity and creditworthiness of creditors to explain unexplained credits successfully, ultimately leading to the rejection of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 657 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375030</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete additions of unexplained credits in a firm&#039;s Books of Accounts under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The partners failed to establish the creditworthiness of the sources of their advances to the firm. The judgment emphasized the importance of proving the identity and creditworthiness of creditors to explain unexplained credits successfully, ultimately leading to the rejection of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>