<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 649 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375022</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed one appeal by remanding the first substantial question of law for fresh consideration regarding the deduction of share issue expenses under Section 35D. The Court dismissed the appeals related to lease equalization charges under Section 115JA, upholding the decision against the Revenue based on a previous Supreme Court ruling. The judgment clarified the treatment of share issue expenses and lease equalization charges under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:10:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 649 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375022</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed one appeal by remanding the first substantial question of law for fresh consideration regarding the deduction of share issue expenses under Section 35D. The Court dismissed the appeals related to lease equalization charges under Section 115JA, upholding the decision against the Revenue based on a previous Supreme Court ruling. The judgment clarified the treatment of share issue expenses and lease equalization charges under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>