<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 634 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375007</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld.CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The Tribunal ruled that the disallowance of service tax under section 43B was not justified as the service tax was payable on an accrual basis from April 1, 2011, as per the Finance Act, 2011. The Tribunal found that the assessee had not claimed any deduction for the outstanding service tax amount and was following the Mercantile system of accounting, similar to a previous decision of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:09:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 634 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375007</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld.CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The Tribunal ruled that the disallowance of service tax under section 43B was not justified as the service tax was payable on an accrual basis from April 1, 2011, as per the Finance Act, 2011. The Tribunal found that the assessee had not claimed any deduction for the outstanding service tax amount and was following the Mercantile system of accounting, similar to a previous decision of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>