<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 614 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374987</link>
    <description>The court granted the mandamus sought by the petitioner, directing the second respondent to pass orders on the review applications. The judgment clarified the petitioner&#039;s right to file a review under Section 16 of the Act, independent of the appeal process outlined in Section 15. The court emphasized the importance of following legal procedures and ensuring that administrative decisions are made in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:08:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 614 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374987</link>
      <description>The court granted the mandamus sought by the petitioner, directing the second respondent to pass orders on the review applications. The judgment clarified the petitioner&#039;s right to file a review under Section 16 of the Act, independent of the appeal process outlined in Section 15. The court emphasized the importance of following legal procedures and ensuring that administrative decisions are made in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>