<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 609 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374982</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value remains the primary basis for valuing imported second-hand machinery, and it cannot be rejected merely because the year of make is not ascertainable or because a Chartered Engineer&#039;s report suggests a different value. The record must establish misdeclaration, fraud, manipulation, or other exceptional circumstances before departure from the invoice value is justified. On the facts discussed, the appellate authority found no such proved grounds, noted consistency with the valuation principles for second-hand machinery, and upheld acceptance of the declared value. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and valuation had to proceed on the transaction value basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2019 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 609 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374982</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value remains the primary basis for valuing imported second-hand machinery, and it cannot be rejected merely because the year of make is not ascertainable or because a Chartered Engineer&#039;s report suggests a different value. The record must establish misdeclaration, fraud, manipulation, or other exceptional circumstances before departure from the invoice value is justified. On the facts discussed, the appellate authority found no such proved grounds, noted consistency with the valuation principles for second-hand machinery, and upheld acceptance of the declared value. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and valuation had to proceed on the transaction value basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>