https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374980 The appeals were filed against a common impugned order passed by the Commissioner(Appeals), remanding the original order and upholding some appeals while rejecting others. The appellants argued that the order violated natural justice principles by not specifying hearing dates and granting a fair opportunity to defend their case. The judgment found the impugned order to be ex parte, lacking proper notice to the appellants, thus violating the Customs Act. Consequently, all appeals were allowed, and the case was remanded for a fresh consideration, emphasizing the importance of adhering to natural justice principles. en-us Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:08:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374980 The appeals were filed against a common impugned order passed by the Commissioner(Appeals), remanding the original order and upholding some appeals while rejecting others. The appellants argued that the order violated natural justice principles by not specifying hearing dates and granting a fair opportunity to defend their case. The judgment found the impugned order to be ex parte, lacking proper notice to the appellants, thus violating the Customs Act. Consequently, all appeals were allowed, and the case was remanded for a fresh consideration, emphasizing the importance of adhering to natural justice principles. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374980